Hypothetical

Okay, so there's this guy without any toes. He's happy. He loves himself and his life, and even though he has a harder time balancing than the guy next to him, it's not a big deal, because he's never known what it was like to have toes. His parents had them removed when he was just a newborn. Now, this was excruciatingly painful for him, but he doesn't remember it, so he doesn't really think about it and he doesn't really care. He has a son, and he wants his son's toes cut off. Toes are hard to clean between, you know? And whatever balance problems exist, the man figures if he's totally happy with his balance, why should his son care? Besides, removing them has some other health benefits too, such as later in life, a toe could get a hair or small string caught around it and have serious problems; This happens to at least a few babies a year (both hypothetically and in real life). And feet have a lot  more surface area with toes attached, which means they make more sweat, and that's really just gross.

Is it okay for him to have his son's toes removed? Chances are, you'll say no.

Now, imagine this guy lives on another planet, and on this planet, this toe removal happens to most children in the world at birth. In fact, they refer to those who haven't had it done as "non-de-toed", and kids with toes are sure to be made fun of in the locker room.

Does this change anything? Chances are, you'll say no.

Now, go back through and replace toes with foreskin, harder time balancing with decreased penis sensitivity and sexual enjoyment, toes are hard to clean between with an intact penis is hard to clean, the string or hair around toes with the zipper issues, greater sweat production with smegma, the other planet with america "non-de-toed" with "uncircumcised", and kids with toes to boys with foreskins